AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Doing so is critical, Chakraborty said, as "human health and the warming of the planet is inextricably linked." has warned that the world needs to stay below 1.5 degrees Celsius of global warming, compared to pre-industrial levels, to minimize the worst impacts of climate change. "But we also need to remember that an emergency as global in nature as climate change requires a global response, and the actions of a single nation should not and cannot make or break whether we reach our climate objectives." Secretary General, said in a statement, CBS News correspondent Pamela Falk reports. make it harder to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, for a healthy, liveable planet," Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for the U.N. The United Nations and scientists around the world have warned for years that failing to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions will result in "extreme" and "unprecedented" impacts around the world, including more catastrophic storm damage, devastating droughts, and threats to health and the global economy. Greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere, increasing global temperatures. most of which is from the burning of fossil fuels. The industry sector, according to the EPA, accounts for 24% of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. "A number of" power companies also expressed support for the EPA's authority, as well as the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics, among others, she said. While the case was still undergoing review by the Supreme Court, Patton told CBS News, the EPA was "quite clear" that any regulations would come from a clean slate and involved all stakeholders to develop pollution standards. "Today's Supreme Court ruling undermines EPA's authority to protect people from smokestack climate pollution at a time when all evidence shows we must take action with great urgency," she said on Thursday. That's what the regulations at issue in this case sought to address. Power plants and smokestacks are "one of the single largest sources" of national and global climate pollution, according to Environmental Defense Fund general counsel Vickie Patton. And that's an extremely dangerous path to go down." A "real setback" in tackling climate change "Having this type of ruling is actually saying … we can actually unapologetically support the polluting of our communities in the United States. "This is really going against all of the evidence and science that we know is requiring more regulation," Chakraborty said. The court's opinion states that when it comes to capping carbon dioxide emissions, "is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme." It also said that a "decision of such magnitude and consequence" should reside with Congress. The plan was never officially implemented as it faced legal challenges and was rolled back under the Trump administration. The case stems from former President Obama's Clean Power Plan, which would have enforced mandates for how much emissions power plants could emit. EPA that the federal agency does not have the authority to regulate industry greenhouse gas emissions. In a 6-3 opinion along ideological lines, the nation's highest court ruled in West Virginia v. The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to limit the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to strictly regulate emissions from power plants, a move that signals a major setback in the fight against the climate crisis. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson makes Supreme Court history 02:16
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |